asolkar/dwl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

clarify intention of feature suggestions

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Devin J. Pohly
2020-12-27 17:15:21 -05:00
parent 7b1b5c75e9
commit 0090b6bed6
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
README.md
View File

@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ dwl is not meant to provide every feature under the sun. Instead, like dwm, it s
- XWayland support as provided by wlroots
- Zero flickering - Wayland users naturally expect that "every frame is perfect"
Features yet to be implemented (possibly as patches) are:
Features under consideration (possibly as patches) are:
- Communication from the compositor to status bars. One possibility is to create a dwl-status protocol that bars can implement to be notified of compositor information. You can already use Waybar or yambar, but without tag information
- Protocols made trivial by wlroots
- Communication from the compositor to status bars. A straightforward possibility would be to use stdout or a provided file descriptor.
- Implement the input-inhibitor protocol to support screen lockers
- Implement the idle-inhibit protocol which lets applications such as mpv disable idle monitoring
- Layer shell popups (used by Waybar)